GLOBAL WATCH / EVIDENCE REGISTER

Programme & evidence tracker.

Follow named programmes from ambition to demonstrated capability. See the evidence, its limits and the professional review behind each assessment.

10 programme records10 professionally reviewed0 awaiting professional review

Current record revisions professionally reviewed and approved for publication. These records are research references, not operational guidance, safety ratings or regulatory approvals.

DATED EVIDENCE SNAPSHOT · 16 SEPTEMBER 2026

Global IASMS Evidence Monitor

What the selected register documents—not a worldwide implementation percentage. 2 direct IASMS records; 7 enabling-capability records; 1 related-activity record. The baseline classification was professionally reviewed on 16 September 2026; later changes require renewed review.

Plans & development

Targets and development activity; delivered outcomes not established.

EASA and Data4Safety partners UK Civil Aviation Authority Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore

Research tests documented

Tests reported within a defined research scope; not operational approval.

NASA FAA-sponsored · ResilienX-led team

Operational use reported

OEM-reported enabling capability; not independently verified complete IASMS.

Boeing

Product capability described

Product description; customer deployment scope unverified.

Airbus

Policy & guidance

Includes proposals, roadmaps and published guidance—not implementations.

EASA Civil Aviation Safety Authority ICAO

Worldwide operational IASMS deployment total: not established. The bars show the composition of this 10-record sample, not global adoption, safety performance or progress towards completion. No trend is calculated until a comparable dated edition exists.

Region

10 of 10 programme records · Sources checked 16 September 2026 · Not a live feed

United StatesDirect IASMS

NASA

Research agency

IASMS flight and simulation research

TechnologyDemonstrated in research

System-Wide Safety project concluded

NASA describes drone flight tests and simulation work combining monitoring, assessment and mitigation. Its System-Wide Safety project page subsequently records the project as concluded.

Professionally reviewedRecord revision 1Source check: 2026-09-16Next check due: 2026-09-21Professional review: 2026-09-16 · Aviation-safety editorial review of the baseline evidence summary, classification, limitations and publication suitability. Not regulatory approval or independent certification.

AI ROLE

Predictive risk support and human-autonomy teaming are research themes; the test report does not establish that every tested function uses machine learning.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: A substantial direct IASMS research foundation in this source sample. Historical demonstrations must remain distinct from current programme activity.
What this does not prove: Neither these experiments nor the archive notice establish worldwide deployment status. Previously announced future tests need fresh confirmation.
Next evidence to watch: A named successor programme, technology transition or operational evaluation with published boundaries and results.
Milestone / event date: 2024 flight tests; reported 2 April 2025. Project archive notice: 16 February 2026.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

NASA drone-safety experiments Agency research reportPublished 2 April 2025; page updated 22 June 2026 NASA System-Wide Safety archive Agency programme statusArchive notice 16 February 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

United StatesDirect IASMS

FAA-sponsored · ResilienX-led team

Regulator-sponsored research / technology supplier

Security and performance monitoring for UTM

TechnologyTest results reported

Completed contract report; follow-on status unconfirmed

The contractor report describes FRAIHMWORK monitoring service health, integrity and performance, with contingency management and selected failure-mode tests in a UTM ecosystem.

AI ROLE

Automated monitoring and mitigation are explicit. The source report does not establish a specific machine-learning role for the whole system.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: More concrete than a concept announcement: a named system, test scope and documented failure scenarios. FAA sponsorship is not blanket FAA operational approval.
What this does not prove: Contractor-authored evidence hosted by FAA; test results do not prove independent safety benefit or nationwide implementation.
Next evidence to watch: A named operational deployment, its approval scope, ongoing performance and independent evaluation.
Milestone / event date: Final report for FAA contract 697DCK-23-C-00287; exact publication date not established from the report.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

Security & Performance Monitoring for UTM Ecosystems — final report Contractor technical report hosted by FAAUndated in the source report; accessed 16 September 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

EuropeEnabling capability

EASA

Aviation safety agency

AI assurance and human–AI teaming guidance

Policy & guidanceProposed guidance

Proposal evidenced; final adoption not established

EASA has proposed an AI trustworthiness framework and further concept-paper guidance. These are evidence of regulatory development, not approval of a particular AI system.

AI ROLE

Assurance of aviation AI, including AI assistance and human–AI teaming.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: An important assurance track to watch alongside technical demonstrations. Rules and technology progress answer different questions.
What this does not prove: A consultation or proposed issue is not a final rule. This record does not claim the 2025 consultation is still open.
Next evidence to watch: Final adopted material, applicability dates and documented application to a named aviation use case.
Milestone / event date: NPA 2025-07 announced 10 November 2025; proposed concept-paper Issue 03 dated June 2026.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

EASA announces its first AI regulatory proposal Regulator announcement10 November 2025 AI concept paper — proposed Issue 03 Proposed regulator guidanceJune 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

EuropeEnabling capability

EASA and Data4Safety partners

Agency / States / industry partnership

Data4Safety

TechnologyDevelopment phase documented

2026 operational-transition target; completion unverified

The programme combines safety reports, flight, traffic and weather data for shared analysis. The reviewed page describes development through 2026 and a planned operational phase.

AI ROLE

Big-data and data-science analysis are explicit; a particular AI model or autonomous mitigation capability is not established here.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: A relevant foundation for shared safety intelligence. Its institutional and data-governance work matters as much as analytical tools.
What this does not prove: The page includes a January 2024 update. Reaching the target year is not proof that the transition happened.
Next evidence to watch: An explicit operational-phase announcement and delivered analytical outcomes with evaluation details.
Milestone / event date: Development began September 2022. Programme page describes a target transition in 2026.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

EASA Data4Safety programme and roadmap Agency programme page; historical roadmapIncludes January 2024 update; accessed 16 September 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

United KingdomEnabling capability

UK Civil Aviation Authority

Aviation regulator

AI-enabled occurrence-report processing

TechnologyPilot planned

2026 commitment; execution not verified

CAA CAP3226 identifies Mandatory Occurrence Reporting among proposed AI automation pilot areas.

AI ROLE

AI-assisted processing of occurrence reports; operational scope and performance results are not specified in this source.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: A practical SMS intelligence use case worth following. A funding or work-plan commitment is not a delivered capability.
What this does not prove: The source is a statutory-charges consultation response, not a pilot evaluation or implementation certificate.
Next evidence to watch: Confirmation of pilot commencement, human review arrangements and measured classification or triage performance.
Milestone / event date: March 2026 document commits to AI-enabled automation pilots during 2026.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

CAA CAP3226 — Statutory Charges FY2026/27 response, page 22 Regulator work-plan statementMarch 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

SingaporeEnabling capability

Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore

Regulator / air navigation service provider

AI Multi Sector Planner and Digital ATCO Assistant

TechnologyDevelopment; trial planned

Multi Sector Planner trials announced for 2027

CAAS says it has developed an AI Multi Sector Planner for trials from 2027 and is developing a Digital ATCO Assistant.

AI ROLE

Controller support: planning across sectors and anticipating traffic or weather conditions. These are decision-support initiatives.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: A clearly identified, forward-looking AI programme with a stated trial target. It belongs on the watchlist, not in a list of completed IASMS deployments.
What this does not prove: The announcement does not supply trial outcomes or establish a system-wide IASMS implementation.
Next evidence to watch: Trial start, operating boundaries, controller-workload findings, fallback behaviour and safety-assurance results.
Milestone / event date: CAAS announcement: 22 July 2026. Multi Sector Planner trial target: 2027.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

CAAS upgrades air navigation services capabilities Authority programme announcement22 July 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

EuropeEnabling capability

Airbus

Aircraft OEM / digital services

Skywise aviation data analytics

TechnologyProduct capability described

OEM describes available AI analytics; deployment scope unverified

Airbus describes Skywise as a data platform using AI to analyse information from disparate sources.

AI ROLE

AI-based data analysis. Specific deployed models, safety-critical uses and assured performance are not established by this overview.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: A relevant industry capability, but a product description cannot settle how it performs in a particular operator’s SMS.
What this does not prove: OEM self-description, not independent validation or evidence that Skywise is a complete IASMS.
Next evidence to watch: A named operator case study with deployment dates, safety use case, accountable decisions and outcome evidence.
Milestone / event date: Current Airbus product overview reviewed 16 September 2026; no dated implementation milestone established.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

Airbus — Artificial intelligence, Skywise section OEM product statementUndated product overview; accessed 16 September 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

United StatesEnabling capability

Boeing

Aircraft OEM

AI and machine learning in safety-data analysis

TechnologyUse reported by OEM

Reported internal application; independently unverified

Boeing reports using advanced analytics and machine learning to support teams identifying potential product hazards, including analysis of in-service data.

AI ROLE

Hazard identification and decision support for safety specialists.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: A concrete example of AI within safety work—not just an autonomy vision. Evidence quality must remain visibly distinct from independent evaluation.
What this does not prove: The manufacturer’s own account does not quantify a causal safety improvement or establish complete IASMS deployment.
Next evidence to watch: Published evaluation methods, error rates, human oversight and independently examined safety outcomes.
Milestone / event date: Chief Aerospace Safety Officer report reviewed 16 September 2026; individual AI deployment date not stated.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

Boeing Chief Aerospace Safety Officer report OEM self-reported useRolling report page; accessed 16 September 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

AustraliaRelated activity

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Aviation regulator

RPAS and AAM Strategic Regulatory Roadmap

Policy & guidanceRoadmap published

Historical roadmap baseline; delivery status needs updating

CASA’s roadmap sets out regulatory development, systems assurance and safety/resilience work for remotely piloted aircraft and advanced air mobility.

AI ROLE

No specific operational AI safety capability is established by this roadmap record.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: Useful context for the environment in which future IASMS capabilities may operate. AAM preparation alone is not IASMS adoption.
What this does not prove: A dated PDF snapshot is not a current delivery dashboard; target dates require separate confirmation.
Next evidence to watch: Updated activity status and any named IASMS or AI safety-assurance trial with documented results.
Milestone / event date: Version 2.1, January 2025, captures the late-2024 roadmap review.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

CASA RPAS and AAM Strategic Regulatory Roadmap Regulator roadmap snapshotJanuary 2025 · version 2.1

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

GlobalEnabling capability

ICAO

International standards and guidance body

Safety Intelligence Manual — Doc 10159

Policy & guidanceGuidance published

Manual described in official guidance overview

ICAO describes guidance on collecting, processing, analysing and using safety data and information.

AI ROLE

A foundation for safety intelligence, not an AI implementation or authorisation.

Sentinel assessment & source record

Sentinel’s assessment · AI interpretation: The organisational intelligence discipline remains relevant whether analysis uses AI or conventional methods.
What this does not prove: A manual does not prove State implementation. National applicability and controlled text must be checked separately.
Next evidence to watch: Documented national implementation and practical, evaluated uses of AI within safety-intelligence governance.
Milestone / event date: Doc 10159 complements Doc 9859 and supports Annex 19 Amendment 2.

EVIDENCE TRAIL

ICAO — Safety Intelligence Manual overview International guidance overviewOfficial overview accessed 16 September 2026

Change history

2026-09-16 · Existing Global Watch baseline carried into the tracker; no fresh source verification claimed.

2026-09-16 · Revision 1 professionally reviewed and approved for publication. Programme facts and source-check dates unchanged.

Sentinel’s interpretation is AI-generated. Professional review applies only when recorded for this revision.

AI research. Professional review. A dated record.

Sentinel prepares evidence summaries and proposed changes. An aviation safety professional reviews the claim, operational context, source quality, uncertainty and publication suitability. A completed review applies only to the identified revision—not to later changes or the programme itself.

Maintenance cycle

Monday research checks prepare a change list; the first Monday of each month adds a broader synthesis. The first scheduled research check is 21 September 2026. A schedule is not proof that a check occurred. Each record retains its last source-check date and next check due; missed checks are marked overdue.

Research findings are proposed updates until professionally approved. Material changes require a new revision and renewed review. A programme can be closed while its historical evidence remains useful. No material change, inaccessible sources and unverified milestones must be recorded explicitly.

Global news, checked against evidence

The scheduled research watch scans international aviation and technology news for programme leads, then seeks regulator, research-agency, operator or manufacturer evidence. Duplicate reports about one programme do not increase the count. Conflicting reports and inaccessible evidence remain unresolved; absence from this selected register does not establish inactivity.

Professional approval checklist

The named programme and its scope match the primary sources.
Source publication dates, event dates and check dates are distinct.
Plans, tests, operational use and scoped approvals are not conflated.
AI interpretation, vendor claims and independent evidence are labelled.
Limitations, human accountability and the next evidence needed are clear.

Public review records show the review date, revision and scope. Approval is an editorial assessment, not independent certification. Source-check dates advance only after an actual evidence check.

Change record · 16 September 2026

Tracker introduced using the existing ten-record Global Watch baseline. Revision 1 of all ten records and the baseline evidence classification were professionally reviewed and approved for publication on 16 September 2026. No fresh source verification or change in programme status is claimed by this approval update. Future material changes require renewed review.